Northwest Atlantic Corridor
Appendix · Methodology

How this monitor is built

A monitor is only useful if its methodology is transparent. Here we explain what we measure, how, with what sources and what limitations the data has.

01

What we track

The key milestones of the deployment of the Atlantic Corridor —one of the nine European Transport Corridors of the TEN-T network (Regulation (EU) 2024/1679)— across Asturias, León and Galicia: Pajares Bypass, electrification, UIC gauge, urban nodes, port connections, line 800 and ERTMS signalling.

02

How we measure delays

For each milestone we record the first publicly promised delivery date (baseline) and every subsequent re-announcement. The delay is computed against the baseline, never against the latest forecast.

Golden rule

The baseline is the committed delivery / commissioning date, never the tender or award date of a contract. Actions that never had a public delivery date (recently tendered works, service contracts, framework plans) are flagged «no target date» and excluded from the delay calculation, to avoid inflating it artificially.

The accumulated delay is the sum of the individual slippages of the actions; since many run in parallel, it does not represent a sequential time span. We break it down into three natures: consolidated (historical delay of what is already delivered), committed (slippage of the delivery date of pending milestones) and overdue (days past the latest promise without completion). All figures are computed against an explicit cut-off date so they are reproducible.

03

Tracking methodology (PMO)

Each action is tracked along ADIF's project lifecycle: informative study → public information → environmental decision → detailed design → tender → award → contract signing → site handover (actual start) → construction → acceptance → AESF testing → commissioning. A completed civil works does not equal a line in service: track, electrification and signalling/ERTMS are independent contracts that often mark the real bottleneck.

Cost indicators: bid budget (PBL), award amount, award discount, certification and modifications. The critical path of the strategic goal (end-to-end UIC freight) is modelled as a chain of dependent actions: a single missing piece blocks the goal.

04

Data provenance

Every figure flags its provenance: official (published by ADIF, MITMA, BOE or PLACSP), PMO estimate (reconstruction from public milestones) and pending. A published figure is never silently mixed with a reconstruction.

05

Sources

06

Limitations

  • Physical works progress data is not always public. We complement it with contrasted press notes.
  • Rail traffic by specific segment is not published; available aggregates are by corridor (Eurostat) or national (CNMC, INE).
  • Budget data arrives several months late. We always state the period of the latest available data point.
  • Map geometries come from ADIF's official WFS (IDEADIF, INSPIRE Railway Transport Network 3.0).
  • Tracking coverage is currently denser in Asturias (37 milestones) than in León (12) and Galicia (13); it will be completed in successive waves.
07

Independence

This monitor is an independent tool. It does not replace the official information of ADIF, MITMA or other bodies: it aggregates it, organises it and makes it publicly available.